The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a petition against the ongoing demolition drive in Gurugram, and asked the petitioners to approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi disposed of the plea, granting liberty to the petitioners to make an urgent mentioning before the high court during the course of the day.
The bench requested the high court’s chief justice to entertain the mentioning either at 1 PM or immediately after lunch at 1.45 pm.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, argued before the bench that the local authorities have been carrying out the demolition drive without issuing show-cause notices to the residents by misconstruing an interim order of the high court.
The bench observed that if the high court’s interim order was allegedly being misconstrued by the authorities, then the petitioners should approach the high court.
“If the high court, in its constitutional​The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a petition against the ongoing demolition drive in Gurugram, and asked the petitioners to approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi disposed of the plea, granting liberty to the petitioners to make an urgent mentioning before the high court during the course of the day.
The bench requested the high court’s chief justice to entertain the mentioning either at 1 PM or immediately after lunch at 1.45 pm.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, argued before the bench that the local authorities have been carrying out the demolition drive without issuing show-cause notices to the residents by misconstruing an interim order of the high court.
The bench observed that if the high court’s interim order was allegedly being misconstrued by the authorities, then the petitioners should approach the high court.
“If the high court, in its constitutional ​Latest News [ SOBAN NEWS: International and National ]
